Formula-level hazard screening, built for review
Upload a text-based formula PDF to draft a preliminary risk recommendation, pharmacist-review MFR draft, and evidence trail. Built for Canadian compounding pharmacists who verify the inputs, complete the site-specific NAPRA assessment, and sign.
Apply to the Founding Pharmacy PilotFormula-level hazard screening
A deterministic preliminary Level A/B/C recommendation with a traceable rule path. The pharmacist must still complete the site-specific NAPRA assessment.
Authoritative hazard data
CompoundCheck attempts configured NIOSH 2024, PubChem GHS, Health Canada DPD, and EPA CompTox lookups, and surfaces missing or conflicting evidence for review.
Documents built for pharmacist review
A preliminary risk-assessment PDF, pharmacist-review MFR draft, and evidence bundle. The MFR draft is not a batch or compounding record.
Get early access
CompoundCheck is being validated with a Canadian compounding pharmacy. Apply below — we review applications and reach out as pilot access expands.
Why now: NIOSH updated its hazardous-drug list in December 2024 — the first update since 2016. 25 drugs added, 7 removed, and three tables restructured into two. Risk assessments citing the 2016 list are out of date.
How it works
Upload the formula
Upload a text-based PCCA or Medisca formula PDF. Ingredients, quantities, and metadata are extracted for your review; image-only scans are not yet supported.
Automatic hazard lookup
Each ingredient is checked against the available configured datasets. Unresolved identities and evidence gaps require pharmacist review.
Review the assessment
Risk level, PPE, and engineering controls with the available evidence, rule path, and any unresolved gaps shown for review.
Sign off and print
Apply your professional judgment, document any overrides, and finalize. The audit trail is built as you go.
AI reads the document. It never assigns the risk level.
That is the bright line CompoundCheck is built on. A language model turns a messy formula PDF into clean inputs and drafts narrative text for your review — and a deterministic rules engine, working only from published hazard data, produces every risk level, PPE recommendation, and engineering control.
Deterministic by design
Risk levels, PPE, and engineering controls come from a rules engine you can audit — never from a language model's opinion.
Evidence and gaps stay visible
Source-backed findings retain their provenance, while unavailable, unresolved, or conflicting evidence is shown as a review condition.
Honest about uncertainty
If an ingredient can't be verified, the assessment says so. Unresolved identifiers are flagged for your judgment, never papered over.
Frequently asked questions
Still curious? Apply, and see a real assessment on your own formulas.
Apply to the Founding Pharmacy Pilot